Ignorance by Choice: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Underlying Motives of Willful Ignorance and Its Consequences

in press

Abstract

People sometimes avoid information about the impact of their actions as an excuse to be selfish. Such “willful ignorance” reduces altruistic behavior and has detrimental effects in many consumer and organizational contexts. We report the first meta-analysis on willful ignorance, testing the robustness of its impact on altruistic behavior and examining its underlying motives. We analyze 33,603 decisions made by 6,531 participants in 56 different treatment effects, all employing variations of an experimental paradigm assessing willful ignorance. Meta-analytic results reveal that 40% of participants avoid easily obtainable information about the consequences of their actions on others, leading to a 15.6-percentage-point decrease in altruistic behavior compared to when information is provided. We discuss the motives behind willful ignorance and provide evidence consistent with excuse-seeking behaviors to maintain a positive self-image. We investigated the moderators of willful ignorance and address the theoretical, methodological, and practical implications of our findings on who engages in willful ignorance, as well as when and why.

Publication
Psychological Bulletin
Linh Vu
Linh Vu
PhD candidate

I am interested in decision making and behavioral ethics.

Ivan Soraperra
Ivan Soraperra
currently at Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin

My research interests include experimental and behavioral economics, with a focus on unethical behavior and cheating, experimental methods, and econometric analysis of experimental data.

Margarita Leib
Margarita Leib
currently at Tilburg University

I am interested in decision making and behavioral ethics.

Shaul Shalvi
Shaul Shalvi
Professor of Behavioral Ethics

My research interests include fairness, equality, values and norms.

Related